Solar costs set to plummet 50% by year’s end

20061026_solarThe cost of solar equipment has been falling over the past several months, but now it looks like cost of solar-generated electricity will drop about 50 percent from where it was at the end of 2008, according to a new report from research firm New Energy Finance.

The firm’s prediction is based on two observations: First, that prices for solar modules, panels and components have been getting lower and lower; and second, that as the economy rebounds, investors will feel more secure sinking capital into expensive solar projects, like plants and larger panel arrays.

The 50 percent drop refers to the cost of generating solar power over the lifetime of a solar plant. This cost is now at $160 per megawatt-hour in sunny locales like Arizona.

Another recent report claimed that solar equipment prices will soon begin to stabilize as demand for rooftop and other systems catches up with supply (a shift spearheaded by Germany). But even if prices flatten out, electricity costs are sure to drop more.

Without government incentives, solar would still be more expensive than energy generated by traditional coal-fired power plants, or natural gas plants. But subsidies and other favorable policies are expected to ramp up — even in the U.S. — in the next year. The difference is that they might be implemented on a slower, state-by-state basis here.

The decline in costs for solar energy could have several major repercussions for average consumers. First, it could become much easier to install your own rooftop solar system, especially with aid from the government and companies with power-purchasing agreements like Solar City and SunRun. Second, with new legislation in place in California, it might become common practice for utility companies to pay for the solar energy generated by their customers’ solar systems. This would fundamentally change the dynamics of distributed power production from sources like wind and solar.

Next Story:
Previous Story:

Companies: ,




Photo of Camille Ricketts

About the Author, Camille Ricketts

Camille is the lead writer for GreenBeat. She came to VentureBeat from Google where she worked on its traditional platforms team, particularly in TV. Before that, she was a reporter for the Wall Street Journal in New York and London. Follow her on Twitter at @camillericketts, and follow VentureBeat on Twitter at @venturebeat.

  • abercrombie0
    Everything will be all right,I am behind you.That’s something,That's what I was thinking.Brilliant idea.iphone club
  • Let's not forget that Coal, Natural Gas and Oil/Gas power generation is also heavily subsidized, which is the primary reason that the cost of generating power from solar is "expensive". If the federal government took away the billions of dollars in subsidies that coal industry receives then solar power instantly would be a more cost effective source for energy compared to coal. Solar Power is distributed energy, there are a lot of reduced costs when you eliminate the need for transportation of energy through high voltage power lines. Solar Power generated on roof tops dose not travel far from point of generation to consumption.
blog comments powered by Disqus